Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 28;12:480. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02554-9

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

ASCs from sSAT, sRC and dSAT showed similar morphology and mesenchymal stromal/stem cells surface marker. AC ASCs from sSAT, sRC and dSAT microenvironments showed a similar fibroblastic morphology. DF Cells of each adipose tissue depot are shown in a forward versus side scatter dot plot. GI Representative histogram of the surface marker CD73; KM CD90 and OQ CD105. Blue histograms represent the unstained cells, and the purple histograms represent the stained (positive) cells. J, N, R The graphs represent the mean ± standard deviation of the percentage of positive cells. ANOVA test evaluated the difference among sSAT, sRC and dSAT microenvironments. p value is described below each graph. Count event count, ASCs adipose stromal/stem cells, CD cluster of differentiation, SAT subcutaneous adipose tissue, sSAT superficial SAT, sRC retinacula cutis superficialis, dSAT deep SAT