Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 25;11(8):1911. doi: 10.3390/nano11081911

Table 1.

Calculated crystallite size (D), internal strains (S) values, and degree of crystallinity (χc) of pure Hap, cerium (III)-doped hydroxyapatite and cerium (IV)-doped hydroxyapatite with various concentrations.

Sample D/nm S/% χc/%
Hap 6.1 ± 0.8 1.5 ± 0.5 31.5
Ca10−xCe(III)x(PO4)6(OH)2
Ca9.95Ce(III)0.05(PO4)6(OH)2 6.3 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 0.6 38.2
Ca9.9Ce(III)0.1(PO4)6(OH)2 5.4 ± 0.6 1.7 ± 0.6 33.7
Ca9.75Ce(III)0.25(PO4)6(OH)2 5.6 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.6 33.6
Ca9.5Ce(III)0.5(PO4)6(OH)2 4.8 ± 0.6 1.9 ± 0.7 34.5
Ca9Ce(III)1(PO4)6(OH)2 3.7 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.9 21.1
Ca10−xCe(IV)x(PO4)6(OH)2
Ca9.95Ce(IV)0.05(PO4)6(OH)2 5.8 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.5 38.0
Ca9.9Ce(IV)0.1(PO4)6(OH)2 5.7 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.6 38.8
Ca9.75Ce(IV)0.25(PO4)6(OH)2 5.5 ± 0.8 1.7 ± 0.5 36.8
Ca9.5Ce(IV)0.5(PO4)6(OH)2 4.6 ± 0.8 2.0 ± 0.6 37.2
Ca9Ce(IV)1(PO4)6(OH)2 3.6 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.9 36.0