Table 1.
Comparison of studied parameters between groups A and B before and after the intervention (anthropometric parameters have already been presented in the paper by Skrypnik et al. 2015 [17]).
| Variables | Group A before Intervention (n = 21) |
Group B before Intervention (n = 17) |
p | g | Group A after Intervention (n = 21) |
Group B after Intervention (n = 17) |
p | g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass [kg] | 91.7 ± 11.8 | 94.5 ± 13.4 | 0.325 | 0.2234 | 89.5 ± 11.8 | 91.8 ± 13.7 | 0.628 | 0.1814 | |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 35.2 ± 3.9 | 34.9 ± 3.8 | 0.747 | 0.0778 | 34.3 ± 3.9 | 33.9 ± 4.1 | 0.725 | 0.1002 | |
| Waist circumference [cm] | 110.8 ± 10.2 | 111.6 ± 11.3 | 0.883 | 0.0747 | 105.5 ± 11.1 | 104.0 ± 10.5 | 0.538 | 0.1384 | |
| Hip circumference [cm] | 115.0 ± 8.0 | 115.8 ± 9.4 | 0.577 | 0.0924 | 111.7 ±8.5 | 112.4 ±9.7 | 0.837 | 0.0773 | |
| WHR | 0.96 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.07 | 0.770 | 0.00 | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 0.92 ± 0.07 | 0.445 | 0.2857 | |
| PSS-10 | 18.00 ± 7.3 | 18.8 ± 7.4 | 0.714 | 0.1089 | 17.1 ± 7.2 | 17.2 ± 7.3 | 0.973 | 0.0138 | |
| SES | 29.1 ± 4.6 | 27.2 ± 4.1 | 0.183 * | 0.4333 | 29.4 ± 4.09 | 28.3 ± 4.3 | 0.414 | 0.2629 | |
| BSQ-34 | 97.4 ± 23.07 | 99.2 ± 30.2 | 0.836 | 0.0680 | 82.5 ± 24.4 | 80.9 ± 25.8 | 0.814 | 0.0639 | |
| FRS | CS | 6.62 ± 0.92 | 6.70 ± 1.16 | 0.978 * | 0.0774 | 5.71 ±0.78 | 6.29 ±1.31 | 0.230 * | 0.5528 |
| IS | 4.04 ± 0.59 | 4.12 ± 0.60 | 0.726 * | 0.1346 | 4.00 ± 0.63 | 4.00 ± 0.71 | 0.987 * | 0.00 | |
| TFEQ-18 | CR | 14.5 ±3.1 | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 0.483 * | 0.2357 | 14.7 ± 2.5 | 15.5 ± 2.6 | 0.371 | 0.3144 |
| UE | 20.4 ±3.8 | 20.5 ± 4.6 | 0.948 | 0.0239 | 19.3 ±3.7 | 19.2 ± 4.4 | 0.906 | 0.0248 | |
| EE | 6.8 ± 2.5 | 8.4 ± 2.09 | 0.0835 * | 06877 | 6.4 ± 1.4 | 7.6 ± 2.001 | 0.037 | 0.7087 | |
BMI, body mass index; CS, current silhouette; IS, ideal silhouette; CR, cognitive restraint; UE, uncontrolled eating; EE, emotional eating; p, level of statistical significance; g, Hedges’ effect size; * Mann–Whitney U test. Significant p value is pointed bold.