Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 20;13(8):2862. doi: 10.3390/nu13082862

Table 4.

Rates of plausible and implausible intakes for each assessment method.

Time Point Method Sample
(n)
Lowe Cut-Off Upper Cut-Off Mean (EI/BMR) Under-Reporters Plausible
Reporters
Over-Reporters
n % n % n %
T1 WR 50 1.20 1.41 1.20 9 18% 41 82% 0 0%
T2 WR 45 1.19 1.42 1.19 6 13% 37 82% 2 4%
T1 FD 48 1.20 1.41 1.45 4 8% 39 81% 5 10%
T2 FD 44 1.19 1.42 1.14 11 25% 33 75% 0 0%
T1 PR (day of WR) 50 1.20 1.41 1.02 13 26% 37 74% 0 0%
T2 PR (day of WR) 43 1.19 1.42 1.05 10 23% 32 74% 1 2%
T1 PR (day of FD) 49 1.20 1.41 1.05 13 27% 36 74% 0 0%
T2 PR (day of FD) 46 1.19 1.41 1.04 15 33% 30 65% 1 2%
T1 PR (3 days) 50 1.22 1.38 1.04 17 34% 32 64% 1 2%
T2 PR (3 days) 46 1.22 1.39 1.01 16 35% 30 65% 0 0%

BMR: Basal metabolic rate, EI: Estimated energy intake, FD: 1-day Food diary, PR: Photographic food record, n: number of participants, WR: 1-day Weighed food record.