Table 2.
ORs (95% CI) of overweight/obesity across dietary pattern trajectory groups.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southern dietary pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.45 (0.35, 0.56) *** | 0.51 (0.38, 0.67) *** | / |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.64 (0.51, 0.81) *** | 0.71 (0.54, 0.91) ** | / |
| Modern dietary pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.83 (0.68, 1.00) | 0.65 (0.45, 0.93) * | / |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.76 (0.63, 0.91) ** | 0.64 (0.44, 0.90) * | / |
| Meat dietary pattern | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.37 (1.05, 1.76) * | 1.37 (1.03, 1.81) * | 2.20 (1.47, 3.26) *** |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.26 (0.88, 1.78) | 1.26 (0.85, 1.84) | 1.63 (1.04, 2.54) * |
* p < 0.050, ** p < 0.010, *** p < 0.001. All models were constructed using three-level mixed-effects logistic regression. Model 1 adjusted for baseline age, gender, living area, individual income, education level, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol intake, and energy intake. Model 2 additionally adjusted for baseline BMI.