Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;11(8):606. doi: 10.3390/membranes11080606

Table 1.

Bone healing percentage (%) of control (T0) and four different graft treatments with DAM, ASCs, and ECM (T1 to T4), on five levels of furcation defects (A–E).

Treatments
Level T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 p *
(n = 20) (n = 5) (n = 6) (n = 4) (n = 5)
A Gingival 19.4 a ± 17.2 49.1 b ± 27.4 49.8 b ± 27.8 27.4 a,b ± 33.7 24.7 a,b ± 17.0 0.006
B 29.5 ± 27.6 53.4 ± 24.5 58.0 ± 28.6 39.0 ± 37.3 32.4 ± 14.6 0.088
C 38.2 ± 28.9 67.9 ± 21.5 66.5 ± 27.5 50.3 ± 33.8 32.6 ± 16.5 0.077
D 45.4 a ± 29.1 77.5 a ± 15.5 72.0 a ± 22.8 58.3 a,b ± 29.4 33.1 b ± 13.9 0.039
E Apical 52.3 ± 27.7 82.8 ± 11.0 75.8 ± 19.4 69.3 ± 26.8 38.5 ± 19.0 0.06

Data expressed as mean ± sd. *: By Repeated Measures of ANOVA. Data were arcsine square root transformed to improve normality. Means with different letters are significantly different (Student–Newman–Keuls test).