Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;14(8):787. doi: 10.3390/ph14080787

Table 3.

Advantages and disadvantages of 3D-bioprinted cancer models compared to other models.

Models Advantages Disadvantages References
2D culture
  • Good reproducibility

  • Low cost

  • Easy to culture

  • Lack of cell–cell and cell–extracellular interaction

  • Fails to mimic in vivo tumour microenvironment

  • Loss of various phenotypes

[62,63]
Animal (mouse) model
  • Short lifespan

  • Less genetic variations

  • Plenty of genetic information

  • Expensive

  • Homozygosity

  • Unreliable predictions for drug safety and efficacy

  • Different responses to certain gene expression

  • Different organ systems

  • Ethical issues

[21,66]
3D cell culture model
  • Presence of cell–cell and cell–extracellular interactions

  • Mimics in vivo tumour microenvironment

  • Various phenotypes are maintained

  • In vivo gene expressions are maintained

  • Long culture time

  • Can have bad reproducibility

  • More expensive than 2D cultures

[63]
3D bio-printed cell model
  • Low cost

  • Able to fabricate complex structures

  • Presence of cell–cell and cell–extracellular interactions

  • Better in mimicking in vivo tumour microenvironment

  • Limited choice of materials is important depending on type of 3D printer

  • Low resolution for certain types of 3D printer

  • Low printing speed

[63,67]