Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis of breastfeeding duration and abnormal lipid risk, OR (95% CI).
| Models | Abnormal Lipid | Breastfeeding Duration | p | Breastfeeding Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Breastfeeding | 0–6 Months | 6–12 Months | >12 Months | ||||
| Model 1 | High TC | 0.954 (0.941, 0.967) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | 1.119 (0.897, 1.397) | 0.762 (0.618, 0.941) * | 0.438 (0.326, 0.588) ** |
| High TG | 1.007 (0.999, 1.016) | 0.101 | 1 (reference) | 0.863 (0.726, 1.027) | 0.978 (0.839, 1.139) | 1.081 (0.906, 1.289) | |
| High LDL-C | 0.982 (0.969, 0.996) | 0.012 | 1 (reference) | 0.969 (0.757, 1.241) | 0.921 (0.737, 1.152) | 0.716 (0.540, 0.947) * | |
| Low HDL-C | 1.021 (1.013, 1.030) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | 0.964 (0.810, 1.146) | 1.026 (0.879, 1.198) | 1.426 (1.201, 1.694) ** | |
| Dyslipidemia | 1.005 (0.999, 1.012) | 0.114 | 1 (reference) | 0.976 (0.857, 1.110) | 0.985 (0.877, 1.106) | 1.100 (0.961, 1.259) | |
| Model 2 | High TC | 0.963 (0.949, 0.976) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | 1.105 (0.882, 1.384) | 0.811 (0.655, 1.005) | 0.501 (0.371, 0.678) ** |
| High TG | 1.005 (0.996, 1.014) | 0.281 | 1 (reference) | 0.877 (0.735, 1.047) | 0.966 (0.826, 1.128) | 1.048 (0.873, 1.259) | |
| High LDL-C | 0.993 (0.978, 1.008) | 0.344 | 1 (reference) | 1.071 (0.829, 1.385) | 1.005 (0.796, 1.268) | 0.881 (0.655, 1.185) | |
| Low HDL-C | 1.018 (1.009, 1.028) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | 0.967 (0.809, 1.155) | 0.992 (0.846, 1.163) | 1.366 (1.142, 1.634) ** | |
| Dyslipidemia | 1.006 (0.999, 1.013) | 0.105 | 1 (reference) | 0.993 (0.870, 1.134) | 0.985 (0.874, 1.109) | 1.114 (0.969, 1.281) | |
| Model 3 | High TC | 0.969 (0.953, 0.984) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | 1.276 (0.990, 1.644) | 0.935 (0.734, 1.191) | 0.561 (0.397, 0.791) ** |
| High TG | 1.007 (0.996, 1.017) | 0.214 | 1 (reference) | 0.939 (0.772, 1.141) | 0.993 (0.834, 1.182) | 1.091 (0.888, 1.340) | |
| High LDL-C | 0.994 (0.977, 1.011) | 0.513 | 1 (reference) | 1.165 (0.867, 1.563) | 1.080 (0.825, 1.416) | 0.899 (0.634, 1.275) | |
| Low HDL-C | 1.016 (1.006, 1.027) | 0.002 | 1 (reference) | 0.948 (0.780, 1.152) | 0.986 (0.828, 1.174) | 1.291 (1.057, 1.578) * | |
| Dyslipidemia | 1.006 (0.998, 1.014) | 0.124 | 1 (reference) | 1.045 (0.903, 1.210) | 1.014 (0.889, 1.158) | 1.126 (0.962, 1.318) | |
| Model 4 | High TC | 0.968 (0.953,0.984) | <0.001 | 1 (reference) | 1.342 (1.036, 1.739) * | 0.945 (0.737, 1.212) | 0.570 (0.403, 0.808) ** |
| High TG | 0.999 (0.988, 1.010) | 0.837 | 1 (reference) | 0.999 (0.814, 1.226) | 1.009 (0.840, 1.211) | 0.976 (0.787, 1.212) | |
| High LDL-C | 0.993 (0.976, 1.010) | 0.406 | 1 (reference) | 1.252 (0.925, 1.695) | 1.126 (0.852, 1.487) | 0.885 (0.618, 1.268) | |
| Low HDL-C | 1.011 (1.001, 1.022) | 0.033 | 1 (reference) | 0.986 (0.806, 1.207) | 0.999 (0.833, 1.197) | 1.196 (0.972, 1.472) | |
| Dyslipidemia | 1.002 (0.994, 1.010) | 0.658 | 1 (reference) | 1.092 (0.938, 1.271) | 1.024 (0.892, 1.175) | 1.056 (0.897, 1.243) | |
Model 1 did not adjust for any factors. Model 2 adjusted for region, sex, age, parental education level. Model 3 further adjusted for physical activity, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, meat consumption, frequency of high-energy food and fried food. Model 4 further adjusted for BMI. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.