Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 28;21:411. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02218-9

Table 2.

Mean score of the KCCQ-12 in 118 patients with primary prevention ICD due to heart failure

KCCQ-12 All
n = 118
Mean score
Ischemic HF
n = 69
Mean score
Nonischemic HF
n = 49
Mean score
Ischemic versus nonischemic HF
p value
Physical limitation 68.0 ± 26.4 64.6 ± 26.2 72.8 ± 26.1 0.062
Symptom frequency 78.6 ± 21.1 77.2 ± 21.5 80.6 ± 20.5 0.305
Quality of life 69.7 ± 25.7 68.8 ± 25.7 70.9 ± 25.8 0.582
Social limitation 71.6 ± 27.0 68.8 ± 27.1 75.6 ± 26.7 0.144
Overall summary score 71.5 ± 22.4 69.5 ± 23.1 74.4 ± 21.3 0.195
KCCQ-12 All
n = 118
Mean score
ICD-VR/DR
n = 61
Mean score
CRT-D
n = 57
Mean score
ICD-VR/DR versus CRT-D
p value
Physical limitation 68.0 ± 26.4 72.0 ± 23.3 63.7 ± 28.9 0.158
Symptom frequency 78.6 ± 21.1 82.3 ± 20.5 74.8 ± 21.2 0.040
Quality of life 69.7 ± 25.7 73.2 ± 25.2 66.0 ± 25.9 0.093
Social limitation 71.6 ± 27.0 75.0 ± 27.5 68.0 ± 26.3 0.096
Overall summary score 71.5 ± 22.4 75.1 ± 22.0 67.7 ± 22.4 0.041

Statistically significant p-values are given in bold

Comparisons are made between ischemic versus nonischemic HF and VR/DR versus CRTD

CRT-D cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, HF heart failure, ICD implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD-VR/DR single or dual lead implantable cardioverter defibrillator, KCCQ-12 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, SD standard deviation