Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 28;20:97. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00778-z

Table 2.

Estimated base pair change in telomere length for a doubling of PFAS concentration

Full Cohort Δbpc (CId) Firefighters Δbp (CI) Office Workers Δbp (CI)
PFHxS
 Model 1a 103 (−16,223) 72 (−92,235) 88 (−98,275)
 Model 2b 84 (− 35,202) 91 (−69,252) 69 (−116,254)
PFOA
 Model 1 273 (54,493)* 395 (85,705)* 175 (−135,485)
 Model 2 240 (25,455)* 329 (13,645)* 165 (−140,470)
PFOS
 Model 1 183 (15,352)* 304 (33,576)* 91 (− 125,308)
 Model 2 172 (5340)* 272 (− 4548) 124 (−95,342)
PFNA
 Model 1 126 (−60,312) 103 (− 144,350) 65 (− 233,362)
 Model 2 68 (−117,253) 52 (−195,299) 116 (−183,416)
PFDA
 Model 1 137 (−27,302) 300 (16,585)* 34 (−170,239)
 Model 2 104 (−58,266) 255 (−31,541) 60 (−148,267)
PFUnDA
 Model 1 26 (−55,106) 79 (−50,209) −31 (−136,75)
 Model 2 13 (−67,93) 61 (−67,190) 2 (−114,117)
PFBuS
 Model 1 10 (−72,92) −33 (− 151,84) 50 (−67,168)
 Model 2 23 (−58,104) −4 (−123,114) 46 (− 72,165)

a Model 1 adjusted for age (years)

b Model 2 adjusted for age (years), dairy and egg consumption (times per week), and occupation (in full group only)

c change in base pairs

d CI = 95% confidence interval

* statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05)