Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;16(4):1074–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.06.020

Table 5.

The comparisons of limited epidemiological data of burning mouth syndrome (BMS).

Sampling
(period)
Assessment of BMS Sex predominant Age distribution
(years old)
Prevalence
Su. et al. present study
(Taiwan)
Nationwide population
(2004–2013)
Insurance dataset Female Mean age: 47.85
Mean age: male 46.26
Mean age: female 48.97
Significant: > 30–39 years old group

Total: 2.76 (per 104)
Male: 2.31 (per 104)
Female: 3.21 (per 104)
Tammiala-Salonen et al.13
(Finnish)
600 volunteers (289 men and 311 women)
(10-year observation)
Questionnaires Clinical exam Female

Mean age: male 51 Mean age: female 57
Significant: female > 30–39 years old group
Total: 1–15% (dependent on the criteria for BMS)
Bergdahl & Bergdahl14 (Sweden) 1427 volunteers (669 men and 758 women)
(year no shown)
Questionnaires Clinical exam Female
Mean age: male 59.1 Mean age: female 56.9
Significant: > 30–39 years old group

Total: 3.7%;
Male: 1.6%
Female: 5.5%
Kohorst et al.15
(USA)
Residents of Olmsted
County (2000–2009)
Clinical exam Female Mean age: 59.4
Significant: > 50 years old group
Total: 10.33 (per 104)
Male: 3.40 (per 104)
Female: 16.95 (per 104)