Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Mar 6;58(3):591–604. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00496

Table 2.

Statistics Results of Modeling Methods Compared to Previous Model Results

training set
test set
validate set
i-val set
model r 2a MAEb SEc r 2 MAE SE r 2 MAE SE ±2SE % TPe
previous ANNf 0.98 25.3 32.6 0.87 51.4 65.6 0.91 42.7 54.8 219 78% g
ANN-t test optimizedh 0.97 27.7 36.1 0.95 38.8 50.0 0.94 42.1 54.1 216 93%
ANN-v validate optimizedi 0.98 29.8 38.6 0.94 47.0 60.6 0.95 39.3 50.7 203 94%
a

Square of the Pearson correlation coefficient.

b

Mean absolute error.

c

Standard error.

d

±2 standard error filter range from validate SE.

e

Percent true positive predictions of independent validate set.

f

Results from previous study19 based on 390 compounds.

g

1492 compound i-val set predicted by the previous model.

h

ANN model with test set stopping and selection.

i

ANN model with validate set stopping and selection.