Table 4.
Indirect effect | Direct effect | Total effect | Ratio indirect/direct | % Mediated | ||||
Mediator |
Coefficient (95% CI) |
p value |
Coefficient (95% CI) |
p value |
Coefficient (95% CI) |
p value | ||
Black vs. White (reference) | ||||||||
Perceived risk to others | 0.59 (0.23, 0.95) | 0.001 | 0.24 (− 0.72, 1.19) | 0.626 | 0.83 (− 0.18, 1.83) | 0.106 | 2.50 | 71.01 |
Importance of protecting distal others | 0.44 (0.17, 0.71) | 0.001 | 0.37 (− 0.61, 1.34) | 0.457 | 0.81 (− 0.19, 1.80) | 0.111 | 1.19 | 54.31 |
Importance of protecting close others | 0.21 (− 0.02, 0.43) | 0.075 | 0.60 (− 0.37, 1.57) | 0.222 | 0.81 (− 0.19, 1.80) | 0.111 | 0.34 | 25.44 |
Latinx vs. White (reference) | ||||||||
Perceived risk to others | 0.11 (− 0.00, 0.23) | 0.056 | 0.34 (− 0.10, 0.79) | 0.131 | 0.45 (0.00, 0.90) | 0.048 | 0.33 | 24.54 |
Importance of protecting distal others | 0.10 (− 0.00, 0.21) | 0.059 | 0.35 (− 0.10, 0.79) | 0.123 | 0.45 (0.01, 0.89) | 0.045 | 0.29 | 22.68 |
Importance of protecting close others | 0.04 (− 0.08, 0.16) | 0.517 | 0.41 (− 0.01, 0.83) | 0.053 | 0.45 (0.01, 0.89) | 0.045 | 0.09 | 8.60 |
Note. Each model was tested separately, included a single mediator and perceived risk to self as a control variable