Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2021 Apr 8;35(3):241–251. doi: 10.1037/neu0000722

Table 4.

Multiple Regressions Evaluating Contributions of PVT and SVT Failure to Cognitive Performance and Symptom Report (N = 338)

Omnibus Model
Parameter Estimates
Independent Variable F p R 2 B SEB β t p LLCI ULCI
Cognitive Performance 10.54 <.001 .088
  Symptom Validity −0.21 0.14 −0.09 −1.45 .147 −0.49 0.07
  Performance Validity −0.54 0.15 −0.23 −3.70 <.001 −0.83 −0.25
  Symptom Validity * Performance Validity −0.20 0.27 −0.05 −0.73 .464 −0.74 0.33
Symptom Report 84.30 <.001 .435
  Symptom Validity 1.49 0.12 0.63 12.88 <.001 1.26 1.72
  Performance Validity 0.42 0.12 0.17 3.50 <.001 0.18 0.65
  Symptom Validity * Performance Validity −0.10 0.22 −0.02 −0.44 .662 −0.54 0.34

Note. Cognitive performance = aggregate factor combining all cognitive performance measures utilized in the present study, derived from the exploratory factor analysis; symptom report = aggregate factor combining symptom report measures utilized in the present study, derived from the exploratory factor analysis; symptom validity = pass-fail status on any of the symptom validity measures at their respective cutoffs (MBIAS > 8, SIMS > 23, Validity-10 > 16); performance validity = pass-fail status on any of the performance validity measure (MSVT or b Test); R2 = coefficient of determination; B = unstandardized beta; SEB = standard error of beta; β = standardized beta; LLCI = lower limit confidence interval; ULCI = upper limit confidence interval;

*

indicates interaction effect; bold font indicates statistical significance after adjustment for familywise error using False Discovery Rate (FDR).