Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;5(16):3216–3226. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004201

Table 1.

The prevalence of 6p CN-LOH, PNH clones, and clonal TRG rearrangement in BMF disorders

Total cohort,
n = 454
6p CN-LOH clone PNH clone Clonal TRG rearrangement
Diagnostic group SNP-A, n = 356 6p CN-LOH (+), n (%) Comparison, OR P PNH testing,
n = 190
PNH (+), n (%) OR P TCR testing, n = 160 n (%) Comparison, OR P
AA 170 141 16 (11) 126 58 (46) 89 26 (29)
AA vs. PNH, 10.39 .025 N/A N/A AA vs. PNH, 0.28 .018
PNH disease 42 39 0 (0) 42 42 (100) 20 12 (60)
AA vs. IBMFSs, 19.59 .002 11.10 .035 AA vs. IBMFSs, 2.27 .208
Classical IBMFSs
  SDS 11 10 0 (0) 0 N/A 5 2 (40)
  DC 34 20 0 (0) 3 0 (0) 6 0 (0)
  DBA 35 22 0 (0) 1 0 (0) 8 1 (13)
  FA 19 14 0 (0) 2 0 (0) 6 1 (17)
  SCN 10 8 0 (0) 0 N/A 1 0 (0)
AA vs. all inherited disorders including IBMFSs, 26.43 .000 AA vs. all inherited disorders including IBMFSs, 16.23 .010 AA vs. all inherited disorders including IBMFSs, 2.23 .161
Other inherited 38 26 0 (0) 3 0 (0) 6 1 (17)
AA vs. all non-AA, 56.67 .000 AA vs. all non-AA, Non-PNH, 38.43 .000 AA vs. all non-AA, non-PNH, 1.09 .849
BMF NOS 14 13 0 (0) 0 N/A 2 0 (0)
 Neutropenia NOS 42 33 0 (0) 1 0 (0) 9 4 (44)
MDS 14 10 0 (0) 5 0 (0) 3 2 (67)
Other 25 20 0 (0) 7 0 (0) 5 3 (60)

N/A, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.