Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;11:17378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96836-0

Table 2.

Dose coverage of the breast-CTV and SIB-CTV and the in the planning CT compared and the estimated delivered dose distribution.

Non-hypofractionated radiotherapy (n = 45) Planning-CT Estimated delivered dose distribution
Daily CBCT EOD Weekly
Breast-CTV
Dmean 51.4 ± 1.6 Gy 49.9 ± 2 Gy 49.8 ± 2.1 Gy 49.7 ± 2.1 Gy

Daily vs. EOD

Δ − 0.1 (− 2.1; 0.7) Gy

p = 0.06

Daily vs. Weekly

Δ − 0.2 (− 2.3; 1.0) Gy

p = 0.01

V95% 85 ± 7.3% 77.4 ± 8.9% 77.1 ± 9.1% 76.8 ± 9.2%

Daily vs. EOD

Δ − 0.3 (− 6.9; 1.6) %

p = 0.13

Daily vs. Weekly

Δ0.6 (− 7.3; 2.2) %

p = 0.02

SIB-CTV
Dmean 61.8 ± 2.3 Gy 61.8 ± 2.4 Gy 61.5 ± 2.4 Gy 61.4 ± 2.4 Gy

Daily vs. EOD

Δ − 0.3 (− 1.9; 0.5) Gy

p < 0.01

Daily vs. Weekly

Δ − 0.4 (− 2.1; 0.9) Gy

p < 0.01

V95% 98.6 ± 2.8% 97.0 ± 4.7% 96.1 ± 6.2% 94.9 ± 7.6%

Daily vs. EOD

Δ0.9(10.9; 1.2)%

p = 0.07

Daily vs. Weekly

Δ2.1(− 20.1; 2.1)%

p < 0.01

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (n = 5) Planning-CT Estimated delivered dose distribution
Breast-CTV
Dmean 40 ± 1.3 Gy 39.4 ± 1.3 Gy 39.4 ± 1.4 Gy 39.4 ± 1.4 Gy
V95% 89.2 ± 4.9% 83.5 ± 3.6% 83.4 ± 3.8% 83.3 ± 3.8%
SIB-CTV
Dmean 47.2 ± 1.7 Gy 47.5 ± 2.4 Gy 47.5 ± 2.3 Gy 47.5 ± 2.3 Gy
V95% 99.8 ± 0.3% 97 ± 5.5% 96.9 ± 5.6% 96.5 ± 6.3%

Mean values and standard deviation. Mean absolute differences between CBCT-protocols (range).