Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;58(11):4110–4117. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04872-x

Table 1.

Antioxidant activity of Yam-Curculigo pilosa composite flours

Y0CP Y1CP Y3CP Y5CP Y10CP
TPC 51.48 ± 0.62a 66.48 ± 1.48b 109.29 ± 0.47c 119.60 ± 1.04c 128.14 ± 3.80d
TFC 6.69 ± 0.27a 10.11 ± 0.31b 20.37 ± 1.79c 26.70 ± 1.81c 40.38 ± 1.57d
TAC 28.88 ± 2.60a 37.11 ± 5.35b 53.20 ± 6.28c 54.70 ± 5.60c 74.44 ± 2.06d
RP 13.90 ± 0.31a 15.53 ± 0.41a 20.30 ± 0.31b 21.45 ± 0.27b 30.35 ± 1.25c
FRAP 26.30 ± 0.55a 71.30 ± 0.38b 97.24 ± 1.31c 106.04 ± 0.80d 110.12 ± 0.07d
AsA 3.37 ± 0.25a 4.30 ± 0.22b 4.95 ± 0.22b 5.52 ± 0.45c 6.60 ± 0.33d

Values were represented as Mean ± SD. Values with different letter across the same row are significantly (P < 0.05) different. TPC, mg GAE/g; TFC, mg QUE/g; TAC, mg AAE/g; RP, mg AAE/g; FRAP, mg Fe2+E/g; AsA, mg/g; Y0CP, yam flour; Y1CP, 1% of yam flour was substituted by Curculigo pilosa; Y3CP, 3% of yam flour was substituted by Curculigo pilosa; Y5CP, 5% of yam flour was substituted by Curculigo pilosa; Y10CP, 10% of yam flour was substituted by Curculigo pilosa