Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 13;3(5):100331. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100331

Table 2.

Explant pathology findings according to groups at last evaluation in patients receiving locoregional therapies and reassessment before to liver transplantation.

Variable at explant analysis Categorisation at last evaluation
p value
Within MC, n = 680 (77.0%) Within UCSF-DS and downstaged to MC, n = 42 (4.8%) AC and downstaged to MC, n = 21 (2.4%) Not downstaged or progressed, n = 140 (15.9%)
Complete necrosis, n (%) 23 (3.4) 2 (4.8) 0 5 (3.6) 0.83
MVI, n (%) 142 (23.8) 10 (23.8) 11 (52.4) 48 (34.3) <0.0001
Tumour grade >II, n (%) 171 (26.4) 17 (42.5) 4 (20.0) 40 (30.5) 0.12
Within MC, n (%) 496 (72.9) 23 (54.8) 6 (28.6) 50 (35.7) <0.0001

AC indicates groups initially beyond the UCSF-DS and successfully downstaged to within MC. MC indicates group initially and remaining within MC between listing and last tumour reassessment. UCSF-DS indicates groups initially within the UCSF-DS and successfully downstaged to within MC. Categorical data were compared using Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square test (2-tailed), as appropriate. AC, all-comers; MC, Milan criteria; MVI, microvascular invasion; UCSF-DS: University of California San Francisco downstaging.