Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 30;14(4):415–424. doi: 10.1159/000517589

Table 3.

Impact of anthropometric and functional parameters on metabolic response to exercise

RERpeak
ΔRER
ΔRER%
R p value r p value r p value
Age, years Ns −0.299 0.006 −0.294 0.006
BMI, kg/m2 Ns Ns Ns
Waist, cm Ns Ns −0.246 0.028
FM, kg 0.254 0.02 0.219 0.04 Ns
FFM, kg 0.305 0.005 Ns Ns
GAUC min, mmol/L −0.311 0.014 −0.387 0.002 −0.378 0.002
IAUC min, mU/L Ns Ns Ns
HOMAIR Ns −0.240 0.038 −0.232 0.046
ISIm Ns Ns Ns
FPG, mmol/L Ns −0.215 0.048 Ns
METs Ns Ns Ns
VO2, mL/min/kg 0.276 0.011 0.244 0.024 0.216 0.048

Univariate correlation analyses, performed for PwO, analyzing the metabolic response to maximal exercise. RERpeak, ΔRER, and ARER% were tested for those parameters that showed significant differences between Ob-N, Ob-preDM, and Ob-T2DM. Correlation is expressed as Pearson's R coefficient; p value is considered significant when <0.05. FM, fat mass; FFM, fat free mass; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GAUC, glucose area under curve; IAUC, insulin area under curve; ISIm, insulin sensitivity Matsuda index; METs, peak metabolic equivalent of tasks; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; RERpeak, respiratory exchange ratio at peak of exercise; ARER, RERpeak-RERrest; PwO, people with obesity; Ob-N, people with obesity and normal glycemic status; Ob-preDM, people with obesity and prediabetes; Ob-T2DM, people with obesity and type 2 diabetes; HOMAIR, Homeostasis Model Assessment index.