Table 2:
Chromosome | Chromosome length | Integration Sites Observed Expected |
|
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.49×108 | 44 | 40.9 |
2 | 2.43×108 | 47 | 39.9 |
3 | 1.98×108 | 34 | 32.6 |
4 | 1.90×108 | 39 | 31.2 |
5 | 1.82×108 | 26 | 29.8 |
6 | 1.71×108 | 28 | 28.1 |
7 | 1.59×108 | 25 | 26.2 |
8 | 1.45×108 | 19 | 23.8 |
9 | 1.38×108 | 21 | 22.7 |
10 | 1.34×108 | 21 | 22.0 |
11 | 1.35×108 | 19 | 22.2 |
12 | 1.33×108 | 18 | 21.9 |
13 | 1.14×108 | 20 | 18.8 |
14 | 1.07×108 | 16 | 17.6 |
15 | 1.02×108 | 13 | 16.8 |
16 | 9.03×107 | 9 | 14.8 |
17 | 8.33×107 | 12 | 13.7 |
18 | 8.04×107 | 10 | 13.2 |
19 | 5.86×107 | 19 | 9.6 |
20 | 6.44×107 | 13 | 10.6 |
21 | 4.67×107 | 7 | 7.7 |
22 | 5.08×107 | 8 | 8.3 |
X | 1.56×108 | 25 | 19.2 |
Y | 5.72×107 | 1 | 2.3 |
Expected integration sites per chromosome were calculated assuming that the incidence of integration was proportional to chromosome length. Integration incidence for the X and Y chromosome were adjusted to account for the equal numbers of males and females in the patient population.