Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD001519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001519

1.2. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Cabergoline versus Bromocriptine, Outcome 2 UPDRS motor scores (part III).

UPDRS motor scores (part III)
Study  
Gershanik 1994 'Off' state: Improvement on cabergoline ‐12.5 (SD 11) v bromocriptine ‐13.3 (SD10.1)
 p > 0.05; NS.
 'On' state: Improvement on cabergoline ‐9.0 (SD8.9) v bromocriptine ‐7.3 (SD8.4)
 p > 0.05; NS.
Gershanik 1994b 'Off' state: Improvement on cabergoline ‐11.1 (SD11.3) v bromocriptine ‐9.2 (SD8.5)
 p > 0.05; NS.
 'On' state: Improvement on cabergoline ‐6.1 (SD8.7) v bromocriptine ‐5.9 (SD7.9)
 p > 0.05; NS.
Inzelberg 1996 Improvement on cabergoline (n=22) ‐7 (SD 12.6) v bromocriptine (n=22) ‐9 (SD 12.7)
 p > 0.05; NS.
Korczyn 1994 'On' state: Improvement on cabergoline (n=16) ‐6.0 (SD 10.8) v bromocriptine (n=14) ‐6.0 (SD 7.9)
 p > 0.05; NS.