Skip to main content
. 2021 May 24;2021(5):CD015043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015043

NCT04621058.

Study name Efficacy of vitamin D treatment in mortality reduction due to COVID‐19
Methods
  • Trial design: RCT

  • Sample size: 108

  • Setting: inpatient

  • Language: English (Spain)

  • Number of centres: 1

  • Type of intervention (treatment/prevention): treatment

Participants
  • Inclusion criteria

    • Admitted to the Respiratory or Internal medicine Units of Santiago hospital (HUA) due to pneumonia

    • Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) defined by blood levels below 30 mg/mL

    • Possibility for observation during the treatment period

    • Signing of written consent (oral informed consent exceptionally)

    • Positive PCR for diagnosis of SARS‐COV2 infection

  • Exclusion criteria

    • Patients taking any type of vitamin D supplement

    • Patients with hypoparathyroidism

    • Pregnant or lactating women

    • Patients in whom the administration of vitamin D is formally contraindicated

    • Patients who at time of inclusion, cannot take vitamin D orally

Interventions
  • Details of intervention: in case of Vitamin D levels < 30 ng/mLor 40 ng/mL (deficiency) patients will take vitamin D supplements (soft capsules)

    • Dose: 1 or 2 capsules 0.266 mg depending on deficiency

    • Route of administration: oral

  • Treatment details of control group (e.g dose, route of administration): placebo capsules

  • Concomitant therapy: none

Outcomes
  • Primary study outcome

    • Mortality (21 days)

  • Review outcomes

    • All‐cause mortality at day 28, day 60, time‐to‐event, and at hospital discharge ‐ probably reported

    • Clinical status, assessed by need for respiratory support with standardised scales (e.g. WHO Clinical Progression Scale (WHO 2020e), WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (WHO 2020f)) at day 28, day 60, and up to longest follow‐up); including:

      • Improvement of clinical status:

        • weaning or liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation in surviving patients i.e. WHO ≤ 6, if ≥ 7 at baseline;

        • ventilator‐free days; ventilator‐free defined as WHO ≤ 6;

        • duration to liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation;

        • liberation from supplemental oxygen in surviving patients i.e. WHO ≤ 4, if ≥5 at baseline;

        • duration to liberation from supplemental oxygen

      • Worsening of clinical status:

        • need for invasive mechanical ventilation i.e. WHO 7‐9, if ≤ 6 at baseline;

        • need for non‐invasive mechanical ventilation or high flow i.e. WHO = 6, if ≤ 5 at baseline;

        • need for oxygen by mask or nasal prongs i.e. WHO = 5, if ≤ 4 at baseline

      • NP

    • Need for dialysis (at up to 28 days) ‐ NP

    • Quality of life, including fatigue and neurological status, assessed with standardised scales (e.g. WHOQOL‐100) at up to 7 days; up to 30 days, and longest follow‐up available ‐ NP

    • Admission to ICU ‐ reported

    • Duration of hospitalisation ‐ reported

    • Time to discharge from hospital ‐ NP

    • Viral clearance, assessed with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) test for SARS‐CoV‐2 at baseline, up to 3, 7, and 15 days ‐ NP

    • Vitamin D serum levels ‐ NP

    • Serious adverse events, defined as number of participants with event ‐ NP

    • Adverse events (any grade, grade 1‐2, grade 3‐4), defined as number of participants with event ‐ NP

  • Additional review outcomes

    • ICU admissions

    • Length of hospital stay

    • Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (at baseline)

    • Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER)

Starting date 09/11/2020
Contact information Joaquín Durán Cantolla
Vitoria‐Gasteiz, Alava, Spain, 01002
+34945207925
joaquin.durancantolla@gmail.com
Notes
  • Recruitment status: recruiting

  • Prospective completion date: 30/11/2021

  • Date last update was posted: 23/12/2020

  • Sponsor/funding: Bioaraba Health Research Institute