Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD002988. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002988

Lawford 1978.

Methods Randomization: yes (mentioned in passing, mentioned as numbered ampules & bottles) 
 Blinding: double‐blind 
 Number excluded: no details 
 Withdrawals: 2 
 Baseline characteristics: HR 119 (sd 21) iv, 115 (sd 30) neb; PaO2 12.3 (sd 2.7) iv, 11.4 (sd 2.4) neb; PaCO2 4.7 (sd 0.5) iv, 5.6 (sd 1.6) neb; PEFR/FEV 86 (sd 26) / 0.68 (sd 0.24) iv, 82 (sd 23) / 0.52 (sd 0.15) neb 
 Jadad score: "strong", score >/= 3
Participants Location: Harrow, Middlesex, England 
 Participants: 16 eligible, 14 final (2 removed because of side effects to iv meds), 15‐65 yrs (mean ?) 
 Asthma definition and severity: unresponsive to hospital meds, no steroids in previous 6 hrs, no recent changes in oral steroid dose, PEF < 120L 
 Exclusion criteria: no details 
 Inhaled corticosteroid use: no details
Interventions Standard care: O2 40% NPV, hydrocortisone 250 mg iv 
 Treatment group: salb 10 mg NEB at 0 min lasting for 45 min vs. salb iv infusion 20 ug/min at 0 min lasting for 45 min 
 Placebo: saline
Outcomes PFTs: PEFR/FEV iv pos 38 (sd 68)/ 0.44 (sd 0.35); neb pos 51 (sd 56)/ 0.21 (sd 0.13) 
 Timing: 45 min 
 Admissions: 
 Side effects: 5 of 9 had undesirable SE (2 withdrew, 2 tremor, 1 palp) 
 Complications:
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Investigators unaware as to order of randomisation sequence