Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD002988. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002988

Williams 1975.

Methods Randomization: yes (method not mentioned) 
 Blinding: double‐blind 
 Number excluded: no details 
 Withdrawals: none 
 Baseline characteristics: HR 128 (sd 11) iv, 125 (sd 7) theoph; BP 139 (sd 17) / 87 (sd 9) iv, 157 (sd 20) / 91 (sd 9) theoph; PaO2 7.5 kpa (sd 1.1) iv, 7.7 (sd 1.6) theoph; PaCO2 5.6 kpa (sd 1.2) iv, 5.3 (sd 1.6) theoph; PEFR 75 (sd 15) iv, 90 (sd 20) theoph 
 Jadad score: "strong", score >/= 3
Participants Location: Penarth, South Glamorgan 
 Participants: 20 final (11 salbutamol, 9 theoph)Asthma definition and severity: definition not specified, included if HR > 120, pred PEFR < 25%, PaO2 < 69.8 
 Exclusion criteria: none mentioned 
 Inhaled corticosteroid use: no details
Interventions Parallel study, iv salbutamol vs. theophylline 
 Standard care: O2 NPV 28%, hydrocortisone 1000 mg iv 
 Treatment group: aminophylline 500 ug iv at 0 min infused over 60 min vs. salbutamol 500 ug iv at 0 min infused over 60 min (8.33 ug/min) 
 Placebo: none
Outcomes PFTs: PEFR iv 114 (sd 27), 128 (sd 53), 161 (sd 85); theoph 109 (sd 34), 118 (sd 43), 134 (sd 64) 
 Timing: 15, 30, 60 min 
 Admissions: 
 Side effects: iv 5 (3 HA, 2 tremor); theoph 7 (2 HA, 3 tremor, 4 nausea, 1 vomit, 4 extrasystoles) 
 Complications:
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Investigators unaware as to order of randomisation sequence