Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD002988. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002988

Williams 1981.

Methods Randomization: not applicable 
 Blinding: double‐blind 
 Number excluded: no details 
 Withdrawals: none 
 Baseline characteristics: HR 124 iv, 117 neb; FEV 0.92 iv first, 1.10 neb first 
 Jadad score: "weak", score < 3
Participants Location: London, England 
 Participants: 15 final (8 iv/neb, 7 neb/iv) 
 Asthma definition and severity: severe acute asthma (otherwise unspecified), PaO2 < 70, HR > 100, pred FEV1 < 25%, run in period of pts able to get consistent FEV1s (within 10% on 3 trials) 
 Exclusion criteria: previous 2hr use of any bronchodilators 
 Inhaled corticosteroid use: no details
Interventions Crossover of terbutaline iv vs. neb, each repeated twice once FEV was maxed 
 Standard care: O2 NPV, hydrocortisone 200 mg iv q6h 
 Treatment group: terbutaline 2.5 mg NEB over 10 min (repeat X 2 for each time FEV1 maxed) vs. terbutaline 250 ug iv over 10 min at 0 min (repeat X 2 for each time FEV1 maxed) 
 Placebo: saline
Outcomes PFTs: FEV pos 0.59 when iv first, pos 0.36 when iv second (these are delta FEV); pos 0.58 when neb first, pos 0.32 when neb second 
 Timing: not specified 
 Admissions: 
 Side effects: 3 tremor unspecified Rx sequence 
 Complications:
Notes Author correspondence: 
 FEV1 were done on 5 min intervals until no more improvement, but times not listed on graph
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Investigators unaware as to order of randomisation sequence