Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD001281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001281.pub2

Comparison 2. Formoterol 9‐12 mcg BD versus dose‐adjusted, SR theophylline.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 FEV1(% predicted) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 PEF variability 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Use of rescue medication 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Symptom score (day‐time) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Symptom score (night‐time) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Adverse events ‐ Any 2 126 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.45 [0.21, 0.95]
7 Serum ECP value (mcg/l) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected