1. Quality Assessment Table.
Study Author | Study Design | Age | Sex | Route of HIV transmi | Race | Case‐Mix | Insurance Status | Final assessment |
Aiken 99 | Prospective Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Bennett 92 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Bennett 95 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Bennett 96a | Retro Cohort | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | 1/6 |
Bennett 96b | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Chan 02 | Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 5/6 |
Curtis 97 | Retro Cohort | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 4/6 |
Holzemer 92 | Pros Rec Rev | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | 1/6 |
Horner 95 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Katz 01 | Pros Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Keitz 01 | RCT | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Laine 98 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Laine 99 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Laraque 96 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Le 98 | F/u Cohort | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Markson 98 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 4/6 |
Messeri 02 | Prosp Cohort | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | 3/6 |
Newschaf98a | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Newschaf98b | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | 4/6 |
Newschaf99 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Safran 95 | CCT | ? | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | 3/6 |
Smith 96 | Prosp Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6/6 |
Stone 92 | Retro Cohort | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Turner 01 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Turner 92 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | 4/6 |
Turner 98 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 4/6 |
Turner 99 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |
Turner 00 | Retro Cohort | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 5/6 |