Study	Reason for exclusion
Acurcio 1998	No comparison group. Descriptive study.
Afessa 2000	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Aiken 1993	Not a study looking at organization of care. Looking at provider training.
Andrulis 1987	Study did not make a comparison between high volume and low volume settings.
Andrulis 1992	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Antonucci 2001	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Aseltyne 1995	Review article.
Bartlett 2001	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. Not a study.
Baskerville 1989	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. Not a study: interviews.
Benjamin 1993	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Berliner 1995	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention or outcomes.
Bhagwanjee 1997	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Bonuck 1996	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention or outcomes. Outcome is self‐assessment of unmet need.
Boulton 1999	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. An article about parent diaries and interviews.
Bozzette 1998	Does not meet our criteria for study design.
Bramble	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Breitbart 1999	Pain management in HIV/AIDS patients.
Brosgart 1999	No patient data.
Butters 1995	Cannot clearly attribute outcomes to differences between multi‐disciplinary types of care. Does not qualify under outreach because home visiting was not measured or reported in a quantitative way.
Carroll 1999	No outcomes of interest.
Celentano 2001	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. IDU vs non‐IDU and receipt of HAART.
Conover 2002	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. Study only assesses individual ancillary services. Not multi‐faceted treatment.
Conviser	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for study type or outcomes.
Conviser 1995	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for study type.
Conviser 2000	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for study type, intervention or outcomes.
Crystal 1999	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. Not fully described.
Cunningham 1998	Intervention is access to healthcare and not provider training/experience.
D'Herouville 2000	No outcomes of interest.
Davis 1991	No outcomes measures reported. No intervention. Not a controlled trial. Study focuses on migration in and out of state of Iowa.
Dodds 2000	Description of a program; whole life is a theory about a model of care. No comparison group or outcomes.
Emlet 1998	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. No comparison.
Evans 2000	Intervention is health locus of control/distress. Not part of our inclusion criteria for interventions.
Feldman 1999	Not a study.
Ferguson 1998	A review and synthesis of the literature. Not on HIV.
Finkelstein 1998	Not our study type. No outcomes of interest.
Flatley‐Brennan 1998	Unsure of functional outcomes.
Fleishman 1994	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. Study looked at patient demographic variables and insurance.
Fleishman 1997	No outcomes of interest. Insurance.
Fournier 1997	No patient‐centered outcomes.
Gardner 2002	Does not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Geletko 1996	Interventions and outcomes not in our inclusion criteria.
Gerbert 2001	Outcome measures not relevant to our review.
Goodkin 1998	Intervention is a bereavement support group. Not one of our specificied inclusions for interventions.
Hansen 1998	Did not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Heckman 1998	Study does not show travel time as a variable but it is described within the text.
Hellinger 2001	Examined hospitalizations based on state and race. Not our inclusion criteria.
HIV Res Network 2002	No interventions of interest.
Horsburgh 1997	Outcomes not relevant to our review.
Jirapaet 2000	Did not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. Study looked at an empowerment program.
Kahn 2001a	Computer generated model and hypothetical outcomes
Kahn 2001b	Not a study. Letter to the Editor.
Katz 1995	Study on insurance. Not our intervention/topic.
Kelly 1989	Did not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Kitahata 1996	Did not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention.
Kitahata 1998	Review paper.
Kitahata 2002	Review paper.
Knowlton 2001	Case management not fully described.
Kupek 1999	No intervention of interest.
Laine 2002	HIV‐focused care only.
Landon 2002	Did not meet our inclusion criteria for type of intervention. A study of provider knowledge and practices.
London 1998	Outcomes not part of our inclusion criteria. Study surveyed caregivers.
Loue 1993	Not applicable to our review.
Lutgendorf 1998	Outcomes not part of our inclusion criteria (coping skills, distress reduction). Intervention is behavioural stress management.
Magnus 2001	Outcome cannot be directly linked to the multi‐faceted intervention.
Magnus 2002	No description of case management.
Markson 1994a	Study is looking at medicaid and expenditures. Not our review topic.
Markson 1994b	A provider training study not an organization of care study.
Mauskopf 1994	Not enough description of AIDS specialty clinic.
McCormick 1994	Outcome measure not part of inclusion criteria (prediction by HCP vs case manager) of whether patient was suitable for transfer to long‐term care facilities post‐hospital.
Mor 1992	Insurance study.
Paauw 1996	Study participants are doctors not people with HIV/AIDs.
Pattullo 1996	There is not an intervention that meets our inclusion criteria.
Randall 1993	Insurance study.
Rotherman‐Borus 2001	No outcomes of interest from our inclusion criteria
Sambamoorthi 1999	No direct outcomes except the cost of homecare (which is the intervention.)
Sambamoorthi 2001	Intervention does not meet inclusion criteria.
Samet 1995	Review is about the organization of care and the resultant additional services provided by the DEU model. No comparison group.
Sebit 2000	Intervention is phyto treatment vs conventional medical care. Does not fit inclusion criteria.
Segal 2001	Intervention does not meet inclusion criteria.
Shapiro 1999	Insurance study.
Sherer 2002	Case management not fully described.
Smith 2001	Study is looking at whether health insurance status affects rates of RX use. Not our intervention.
Solomon 1991	Insurance study.
Sowell 1992	Case management not fully described.
Stein 1991	Insurance study
Stoskopf 2001	Outcomes not part of our inclusion criteria.
Strathdee1998	A provider training study.
Turner 1994	No mention of volumes when looking at AIDS specialty clinic.
Turner 1995	Study reports on prenatal outcomes. Not our intervention.
Turner 1996a	Study reported on birth outcomes. Not one of our interventions.
Turner 1996b	HIV speciality clinic not described in enough detail.
Turner 2000	Outcomes not part of our inclusion criteria.
Valenti 2002	Review paper. Intervention is viral load testing/resistance testing.
Weber 2000	No intervention of interest for organization of care.
Wilson 1998	No description of how the two centres discussed in study (FFS/HMOs) were different. Only staff model described.