Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr 24;2000(2):CD002261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002261

Pinter 1999.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group design. 
 Randomisation by computer generated random numbers. Prospective stratification for high (> 600 mg) versus low (<600 mg) daily levodopa dose and whether or not other medication for PD was being taken. 
 Medication allocated consecutively in blocks of 4 in centres. 
 Location ‐ 9 centres in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis using last observation carried forward method. 
 Duration of therapy = 11 weeks.
Participants Pramipexole ‐ 34 patients with 5 drop outs (15%). 
 Placebo ‐ 44 patients with 6 drop outs (14%). 
 Details of terminations given. 
 Patients comparable for age, duration of disease and UPDRS total score at baseline. Note: higher frequency of women in pramipexole arm (41%) compared with placebo arm (30%). 
 Hoehn and Yahr scale comparable between arms at baseline. 
 Mean baseline levodopa dose: pramipexole arm = 538 (SD 314) mg/d; placebo arm = 593 (SD 264) mg/d.
Interventions Blind titration to maximum of 5 mg/d of pramipexole. 
 Titration phase < or = 7 weeks. 
 Maintenance = 4 weeks. 
 Dose reduction = 1 week. 
 Mean dose of pramipexole in active arm 3.59 mg/d. 
 NO change in levodopa dose allowed.
Outcomes Primary: UPDRS total score. 
 Secondary: UPDRS subscale scores. 
 Off time. 
 Schwab and England scale in on and off phase. 
 Dyskinesia scale ‐ details not given. 
 Clinicians global impression scale. 
 Adverse events.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear