Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;2021(7):CD010772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010772.pub3

Hancock 2009.

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling Consecutive new patient referrals to memory clinic attending with an informant
Patient characteristics and setting Memory clinics in a psychiatric hospital and cognitive function clinic based in a regional neuroscience centre in the UK, n = 144
Index tests IQCODE 16 item, English language
Target condition and reference standard(s) Clinical dementia diagnosis using DSM‐IV
Flow and timing 144 included, no figures to quote how many ineligible over study period
Index test performed independently from clinical assessment and not used to assess reference standard. Both tests performed on same day
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   Low risk