Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;2021(7):CD010772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010772.pub3

Sikkes 2010.

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling All consecutive patients diagnosed with probable AD, MCI (mild cognitive impairment) or SMC (subjective memory complaint) whose informant completed an IQCODE were included
Patient characteristics and setting Alzheimer Centre at a University Hospital in the Netherlands; n = 328
Index tests IQCODE 16 item, Dutch language
Target condition and reference standard(s) Clinical dementia diagnosis using NINCDS‐ADRDA
Flow and timing 328 participants included ‐ no record given of numbers screened but not included.
Informants completed IQCODE while participants were assessed for clinical diagnosis and this was done independently of IQCODE result
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? No    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? No    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   High risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     High
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   Low risk