Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;2021(7):CD010772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010772.pub3

Tang 2003.

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling Consecutive admissions of first‐ever or recurrent stroke
Patient characteristics and setting 484 were admitted to the Acute Stroke Unit of a general teaching hospital in Hong Kong in the study period; n = 189 included
Index tests IQCODE 26 item, Chinese language
Target condition and reference standard(s) Clinical dementia diagnosis using DSM‐IV
Flow and timing Of 484 potential participants, 471 had an informant available. 95 were excluded due to their response to IQCODE items (> 20% scored 'I don't know'); 17 were excluded due to 'physical frailty' and 18 due to 'prolonged hospitalisation'.
IQCODE assessment was performed independently from clinical assessment by a psychiatrist, both were conducted 3 months after index stroke. The clinical assessment was performed in outpatient clinic setting
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     High
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? No    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   High risk