Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD001517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001517

Murayama 1996.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group design.
 Randomisation method not given. Randomised in blocks of 4, (2 ropinirole, 2 bromocriptine).
 Intention to treat and per protocol analysis.
 Location: 105 sites, Japan.
 Duration: 8 weeks.
Participants On L‐dopa group:
 Ropinirole: 132 patients with 27 drop‐outs (20%).
 Bromocriptine: 135 patients with 35 drop‐outs (26%).
 Details of terminations given. 
 Age: ropinirole 65.8 years (SD 8.5), bromocriptine 64.2 years (SD 9.1).
 Hoehn and Yahr at baseline: both groups median stage III.
 Inclusion criteria:
 IPD ‐ 2 groups: de novo and L‐dopa treated patients. Some of the latter may not have suffered motor complications.
 Age 20‐80 years.
 Exclusion criteria: Severe psychiatric symptoms, severe cardiac, hepatic or renal disease.
Interventions Ropinirole: Initial dose 0.5mg/d increased by 1mg/d increments weekly to a maximum of 9mg/d, mean 4mg/d.
 Bromocriptine: Initial dose 1.25mg/d increased by 2.5mg/d increments weekly to a maximum of 22.5mg/d, mean 9.2mg/d.
 Levodopa could be reduced.
Outcomes Hoehn and Yahr
 Individual symptoms of Parkinson's
 Adverse events
Notes Only data from the l‐dopa treated group used.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate