Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 22;2002(3):CD004107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004107

Adams 2001.

Methods DESIGN: Randomised Trial of Two Interventions 
 METHOD OF RANDOMISATION: Random numbers after stratification for age, gender, and number already in each group. 
 MEANS OF ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT‐ not stated. 
 OUTCOME ASSESSOR BLINDING ‐ not stated. 
 WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUTS ‐ all subjects accounted for.
Participants Eligible: 380 
 Randomised: 172 
 Completed: 134 (Intervention 73, Control 61) 
 Age: mean: PFM 37.3 yrs , Symptoms 35.5 yrs 
 Range: eligible range 16 to 70 yrs 
 Sex: PFM: Male / Female ‐ 40%/60% 
 Symptoms 38%/62% 
 Asthma Diagnosis: ATS 
 Recruitment: Inpatients & outpatients 
 Diseases Included: 
 Major exclusions: Previous life threatening asthma, previous or current action plan, pregnancy, poor perception of bronchoconstriction(histamine challenge), baseline FEV1 <1.5L 
 Baseline: 
 FEV1: 
 PEF: mean(SD) % predicted PFM: 75.8(18), Symptoms 75.6(18) 
 Exacerbations:
Interventions Setting: Inpatients & outpatients 
 Type: Two optimal self management interventions: 
 (1) education in use of written action plans, monthly telephone contact for reinforcement and data collection and ongoing education, self monitoring of PEF. Seen by specialist on entry to study and commenced on inhaled corticosteroids 
 (2) same as intervention 1 but symptom self monitoring 
 Duration: Initial intervention duration not stated. Monthly telephone call for 12 months. months
Outcomes Hospitalisation, ER visits, FEV1, days off work or school, PD20 histamine, severity self‐rating.
Notes Jadad Score: 5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available