Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 22;2002(3):CD004107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004107

Cote 2001.

Methods DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial of two interventions 
 METHOD OF RANDOMISATION: Stratified by treatment centre, randomisation method not stated. Control group not randomised. 
 MEANS OF ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT‐ not stated, control group open 
 OUTCOME ASSESSOR BLINDING ‐ 
 WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUTS ‐
Participants Eligible: not stated 
 Randomised: 126 (Intervention LE ?, intervention SE ?) 
 Completed: 98 ( Intervention LE 30, intervention SE 33, control 35) 
 Age: Overall mean: 34.5 yrs Range: >18 yrs 
 Sex: Male / Female ‐ 
 Asthma Diagnosis: Doctor diagnosis 
 Recruitment: ER or outpatient clinic with exacerbation 
 Diseases Included: 
 Major exclusions: > 40yrs with FEV1 <80% (to avoid COPD), any concurrent illness 
 Baseline: Mean duration asthma 10.2 yrs. 
 FEV1: 
 PEF: % predicted: Intervention LE 89.8%, Intervention SE 89.8% 
 Exacerbations: admitted with acute exacerbations
Interventions Setting: 2 university hospitals 
 Type: 2 interventions and a non randomised control group. 
 Intervention LE: Limited education but including action plan‐ instructed in use of inhaler, explanation of self action plan by physician. Choice of action plan based on symptoms or PEF. Received standard care with therapy modified according to action plan. 
 Intervention SE: Included the LE intervention plus self management education ‐ a structured educational program based on the 'PRECEDE model'‐ including predisposing factors, enabling factors and reinforcement. 
 Control group received usual care. ‐ not used as not randomised 
 Duration: SE intervention conducted 2 weeks after randomisation ‐ length of time not stated. Reinforced at 6 months
Outcomes Knowledge,ER visits, unscheduled Dr visits, PEF, quality of life 
 compliance
Notes Jadad Score: 4
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available