Table 5.
The performance of LPFS for disease gene selection and sample label prediction
Experiment | Hamming loss | One-error | Coverage | AUC | AUPR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q20 versus Q80 | 0.210 ± 0.027 | 0.676 ± 0.081 | 0.382 ± 0.404 | 0.513 ± 0.064 | 0.193 ± 0.024 |
Q20 versus Q92 | 0.220 ± 0.021 | 0.707 ± 0.063 | 0.397 ± 0.313 | 0.524 ± 0.060 | 0.211 ± 0.024 |
Q20 versus Q111 | 0.229 ± 0.024 | 0.733± 0.071 | 0.410 ± 0.353 | 0.556 ± 0.058 | 0.186 ± 0.020 |
Q20 versus Q140 | 0.226 ± 0.016 | 0.724 ± 0.048 | 0.406 ± 0.241 | 0.570 ± 0.066 | 0.210 ± 0.031 |
Q20 versus Q175 | 0.226 ± 0.015 | 0.726 ± 0.046 | 0.407 ± 0.232 | 0.605 ± 0.067 | 0.226 ± 0.015 |