Sun 2014.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 206 adults undergoing cholecystectomy in China | |
Interventions | Group 1: hair removal with a razor (n = 98)
Group 2: no hair removal (n = 110) Product details: no details are given for the razor. Timing of hair removal: not reported. Hair removed by: trained nurses. Venue for hair removal: not reported. |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: surgical site infection assessed using Ministry of Health definition. No further details given. | |
Notes | Published in Chinese. No details of conflict of interest. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were allocated using random number tables. Comment: method of generation of randomisation clear. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details provided. Comment: not clear whether the person responsible for allocation to groups would have been able to predict to which group a potential participant would be allocated. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Care providers blinded | Unclear risk | Not reported. Comment: unclear whether care providers were blinded to intervention allocation. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Participants blinded | High risk | Not reported. Comment: participants would have been aware if hair had been removed. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported. Comment: unclear whether assessors were blinded to intervention allocation. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) ITT analysis undertaken | Unclear risk | Not reported. Comment: no discussion of whether participants were analysed in the groups to which they had been allocated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Drop out rate acceptable | Unclear risk | Not reported. Comment: insufficient details to permit a judgement. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Main outcomes reported. Comment: unlikely to be affected by reporting bias. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: participant groups were equal or similar. |