Hsu 2014.
Methods | Open‐label, randomised controlled trial (registration no. NCT1769365) Dates the study was conducted: not reported Funding sources and potential conflicts of interest: funded by research grant NSC 99‐2314‐B‐075B‐009‐MY2 from the National Science Council. Authors declare no conflicts of interest Definition of compliance: assessed by pill counts. Good compliance was defined as taking 80% of the total medication |
|
Participants | umber and type of participants: 307 H.pylori‐positive participants were enrolled in the study Participants were randomised to 3 different treatment groups: 7‐day standard triple regimen, 10‐day sequential therapy and 7‐day concomitant therapy. Only data related to STT and SEQ are relevant Country: Japan Number of participants randomised: 307 (ITT sample) Number of participants in the ITT 7‐day STT arm: 103 Number of participants in the ITT 10‐day SEQ arm: 102 Number of participants in the PP sample: 303 Number of participants in the PP 7‐day STT arm: 101 (1 insufficient compliance and 1 lost to follow‐up) Number of participants in the PP 10‐day SEQ arm: 100 (2 insufficient compliance) Mean age of the population reported as the number of participants by treatment group:
Sex (M/F) per treatment group
Medical condition at baseline (endoscopic findings) reported as n (%) in STT and SEQ respectively:
H. pylori diagnostic methods in all treatment arms: by RUT, histology or culture |
|
Interventions |
Name, dose timing of antibiotics in 7‐day STT: pantoprazole 40 mg twice a day + clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day + amoxicillin 1 g twice a day (7 days) Name, dose timing of antibiotics in 10‐day SEQ: pantoprazole 40 mg twice a day + amoxicillin 1 g twice a day (5 days) followed by pantoprazole 40 mg twice a day + clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day + metronidazole 500 mg twice a day (5 days) Sensitivity test (yes/no) to antibiotics before/after treatment: Yes. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). H. pylori strains were tested for clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole susceptibilities using the Etest (AB Biodisk). H. pylori strains with MICs of 1 g/ml, 0.5 g/ml, and 8 g/ml were considered to be resistant to clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole, respectively A total of 127 (elsewhere reported 129 ‐ not clear) strains were isolated of the 160 participants receiving endoscopy and bacterial culture on enrolment Results are reported as (n of susceptible/n of resistant) by antibiotic and treatment arms respectively:
Method of assessment of H. pylori status after treatment: Eradication defined as the negative results of all RUT, histology, and culture, or (ii) a negative result from the UBT Time for assessment of H. pylori status after treatment: 6 weeks |
|
Outcomes | ITT eradication rate (%) (95% CI) by treatment group:
PP eradication rate (%) (95% CI) by treatment group:
Eradication (%) in SEQ and STT according to antibiotic resistances: Metronidazole‐resistant strains:
Claritromycin‐resistant strains rate (%) by treatment group:
Dual resistant strains rate (%) by treatment group:
Adherence: not reported. Compliance rate (%) (95% CI) by treatment group: (n = 1314)
Incidence rate (%) (95% CI) of AEs by treatment group :
Incidence (%) serious AEs SEQ/STT: not reported Outcome related to adherence was not reported |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | A computer‐generated number sequence was used |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | An independent research assistant assigned the therapies according to the treatment allocations kept in the envelopes |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Primary outcome data were clearly reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
Publication format | Low risk | Full article |