Huang 2013.
Methods | Prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial Dates the study was conducted: from January 2008 to December 2010 Funding sources and potential conflicts of interest: study funded in full by Key Projects of the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China, No. 2007BAI04B02. Authors declare no conflicts of interest Definition of compliance: not defined Adherence was monitored by telephone interview of the participant or parent and review of daily reporting card |
|
Participants | Number and type of participants: 360 H.pylori‐positive participants (all children) were enrolled in the study Participants were randomised to 3 different treatment groups: 7‐day standard triple regimen, 10‐day standard triple regimen and 10‐day sequential regimen Country: China Number of participants randomised: 360 (ITT sample) Number of participants in the 7‐day STT arm: 118 Number of participants in the 10‐day STT arm: 124 Number of participants in the 10‐day SEQ arm: 118 Mean age of the population reported as the number of participants by treatment group, 7‐day STT, 10‐day STT / 10‐day SEQ:
Sex (M/F) per treatment group
Medical condition at baseline was not detailed; just confirmed H.pylori gastritis H. pylori diagnostic methods in all treatment arms: RUT, HpSA, culture and histology |
|
Interventions |
Name, dose timing of antibiotics in 7‐day STT: omeprazole 0.8 – 1.0 mg/kg/d + clarithromycin 20 mg/kg/d + amoxicillin 30 mg/kg/d Name, dose timing of antibiotics in 10‐day STT: omeprazole 0.8 – 1.0 mg/kg/d + clarithromycin 20 mg/kg/d + amoxicillin 30 mg/kg/d Name, dose timing of antibiotics in 10‐daySEQ: omeprazole 0.8 – 1.0 mg/kg/d + amoxicillin 30 mg/kg/ (during 5 days) and omeprazole 0.8 – 1.0 mg/kg/d + clarithromycin 20 mg/kg/d + metronidazole 20 mg/kg/d (during 5 days) (Total: 10 days) Sensitivity test (yes/no) to antibiotics before/after treatment: not performed Method of assessment of H. pylori status after treatment: by a negative H. pylori stool antigen test Time for assessment of H. pylori status after treatment: 4 weeks |
|
Outcomes | ITT eradication (%) (95% CI) by treatment group:
PP eradication (%) by treatment group:
Adherence (%) (95% CI) to therapy by treatment group: (n = 1314)
Metronidazole resistance (%) before treatment, SEQ ITT/PP: not reported Metronidazole resistance (%) before treatment, STT ITT/PP: not reported Clarithromycin resistance (%) before treatment, SEQ ITT/PP: not reported Clarithromycin resistance (%) before treatment, STT ITT/PP: not reported ITT adherence by amount of drugs taken and by treatment group 14‐day STT/10‐day SEQ:
Incidence of AEs by treatment group (n, %):
Incidence (%) serious AEs SEQ/STT: not reported Outcome related to adherence was not reported |
|
Notes | The 10‐day sequential regimen was significantly more effective than standard 7‐day or 10‐day triple regimens in eradicating H. pylori infection in Chinese children | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Restricted randomisation using block randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | The randomisation code was developed by using a computer random‐number generator to select random permuted blocks, with a varied block size of 4, 8 or 10 |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Primary outcome data were clearly reported, however authors failed to report outcomes related to adherence |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The details of treatment assignments were unknown to any of the investigators, study co‐ordinators or participants and were contained in a set of sealed envelopes |
Publication format | Low risk | Full article |