Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 26;2004(1):CD001384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001384.pub2

Canny 1997.

Methods DESIGN: prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo‐controlled trial 
 RANDOMISATION: ketotifen and placebo were supplied by Sandoz Canada Inc.
Participants N = 66 (randomised) 
 N = 52 (completed) 
 WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT: 10 in ketotifen group (unstable asthma: 6, poor compliance: 2, side effects: 2), 4 in placebo group (unstable asthma: 2, poor compliance: 1, side effects: 1) 
 AGE: 6‐13 years (mean 8,65 years) 
 SEVERITY: asthma diagnosis based on a compatible clinical history and the presence of bronchial hyperreactivity; required continuous treatment with an inhaled steroid preparation on < 1 mg/day for at least one month
Interventions DOSE: 2 mg/day 
 RUN‐IN: 4 weeks 
 TREATMENT: 10 weeks 
 ADDITIONAL MEDICATION: beta‐2 agonists, inhaled steroids
Outcomes reductions of ICS dosage (defined as average daily dose of ICS used during the follow‐up phase, expressed as a percentage of the average daily dose required during the baseline phase); FEV1, diary card data (symptom score, PEFR diurnal variability, number of doses of inhaled beta‐2 agonists irrespective of dosage or delivery system), logarithm of PC20, adverse effects
Notes purpose of study was to evaluate a steroid sparing effect of Ketotifen
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Described as randomised; other information not available
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Ketotifen and placebo were supplied by Sandoz Canada Inc.