Vaira 2020.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Multicentre randomised controlled trial with 40 days of follow‐up | |
Participants |
Location: multicentre, Italy, Belgium, UK Setting of recruitment and treatment: University Hospital of Sassari and the Bellaria‐Maggiore Hospital in Bologna (Italy) Sample size: 18
Participants: Participants with COVID‐19 related anosmia for more than 30 days defined as a Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test score ≤ 40 Baseline characteristics:
Inclusion criteria for the study:
Exclusion criteria for the study:
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention group: systemic cortisone therapy with prednisone starting with 1 mg/kg and tapering the dose for 15 days accompanied by nasal irrigation with betamethasone, ambroxol and rinazine for 15 days Comparator group: the control group did not receive any therapy Use of additional interventions: none noted |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes of interest in the review: Primary outcomes: Presence of normal olfactory function
Serious adverse effects
Change in sense of smell
Secondary outcomes: Prevalence of parosmia
Change in sense of taste
Disease‐related quality of life
Other adverse effects (including nosebleeds/bloody discharge)
Other outcomes reported by the study:
|
|
Funding sources | None reported | |
Declarations of interest | No conflicts of interest declared | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The patients included in the study were randomly divided into two groups using a computer generated random number table" Comment: author contacted and confirmed randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided Comment: author contacted; remains unclear |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "Study was not blinded to participants. No placebo was used for the comparator group." Comment: the control group did not undergo any placebo treatment |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Both the researcher who performed the pre‐ and post‐treatment psychophysical assessment of smell and the statistician who analyzed the data were blinded to the patient allocation group" Comment: appropriate blinding performed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: all 18 patients enrolled were followed up and outcomes reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no trial protocol or registration could be identified to assess this |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no additional sources of bias detected |
CCCRC: Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center IQR: interquartile range