Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 22;2021(7):CD013876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013876.pub2

NCT04638673.

Study name NeuroCovid rehab and recovery related to COVID‐19 diagnosis 
Methods To evaluate a transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in the treatment of the neurological symptoms of COVID‐19 termed NEUROCOVID
Participants Patients with COVID‐19 suffering from the neurological symptoms associated with infection
Inclusion criteria:
  • COVID‐positive

  • At home

  • Afebrile

  • Anxiety

  • Depression

  • Vertigo

  • Anosmia

  • Headaches

  • Irritability

  • Cognitive processing


Exclusion criteria:
  • Damage to left ear anatomy

  • Unstable haemodynamic effects

  • Ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke after developing COVID

  • Unable to give consent, follow instructions

  • Unable to read or write or speak English

  • No access to home WiFi


Planned sample size: estimated enrolment 30 participants
Interventions Intervention group
Active‐Active Stimulation Group
  • Participants will receive active taVNS stimulation for weeks 1 to 4 of the stimulation portion of this study using Soterix taVNS model 0125‐LTE


Comparator Group
Sham‐Active Stimulation Group
  • Participants will receive sham taVNS stimulation for weeks 1 and 2 and active stimulation for weeks 3 and 4 of the stimulation portion of this study

Outcomes Outcomes of interest in the review:
Primary outcomes:
Recovery of sense of smell
  • Not reported


Disease‐related quality of life
  • The primary outcome was change in score of Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 from baseline to week 4 (end of treatment) 

  • The PPHQ‐9 is a 9‐question instrument given to patients in a primary care setting to screen for the presence and severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27. Higher scores mean worse symptoms. For the purpose of this study:

    • remission: minimal to absence of symptoms; PHQ‐9 score < 5;

    • response: 50% or greater decrease in PHQ‐9 baseline severity; residual symptoms remain;

    • partial response: 26% to 49% decrease in PHQ‐9 baseline severity; 

    • non‐response: less than 25% decrease in PHQ‐9 baseline severity.


Serious adverse effects 
  • Not reported


Secondary outcomes:
Change in sense of smell
  • Not reported


Overall, generic quality of life
  • Not reported


Prevalence of parosmia
  • Not reported


Other adverse effects (including nosebleeds/bloody discharge)
  • Not reported


Other outcomes reported by the study:
  • None reported

Starting date 19 November 2020
Contact information Sarah Huffman
Email: huffmans@musc.edu
Morgan Dancy
Email: maddoxm@musc.edu
Notes Estimated study completion date: June 2021 
Trial registered in USA
Uncertainty over future inclusion in the review:
It is not clear from the description provided whether participants will all have olfactory dysfunction at baseline and, if so, whether they will have had ≥ 4 weeks of olfactory dysfunction. We are awaiting confirmation from the study authors.