Lescure 2021.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT Blinding: quadruple blinding Date of study: from 28 March 2020 to 3 July 2020 Location: multicentre (45 centres) / Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Russia, and Spain Follow‐up duration (days): 60 | |
Participants |
Population: patients with confirmed (any specimen) COVID‐19 (moderate‐critical) admitted to 45 centres in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Russia, and Spain. Randomised: 420 participants (n1 sarilumab 400 mg = 173/ n2 sarilumab 200 mg = 161/ n3 control = 86) Characteristics of participants
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals: 0% dropout, withdrawal due to AEs: NR |
|
Interventions |
Intervention
Control: placebo Definition of standard care: local standard of care Co‐interventions Steroid use at baseline or any time during the study Sarilumab 400 mg: 78 (45%) Sarilumab 200 mg: 58 (36%) Placebo: 39 (45%) |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome of the trial Time from baseline to clinical improvement of ≥ 2 points on a 7‐point ordinal scale. Discharge prior to day 29 was considered as a 2‐point improvement. Note: the definition of clinical improvement extracted is improvement from baseline by at least 2 categories on a 7‐point ordinal scale |
|
Notes |
Funding: private (Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc)
Conflict of interest: yes, declared. F‐XL has received lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Gilead Science. HH has nothing to disclose of relevance to this study. RF has no financial conflicts to disclose. JSL, GS, PW, NP, and OH are employees of Sanofi and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company.
Protocol: NR
Statistical plan: NR
Data‐sharing stated: yes, currently available
Data accessibility: clinicalstudydatarequest.com/ Overall comment: in addition to the pre‐print article, the supplementary materials, and the study registry were used in data extraction and r'Rsk of bias' assessment. Neither study protocol nor statistical analysis plan were available. There were no substantive differences between the prospective registry and the pre‐print article. The study was an adaptive design and any changes in protocol versions are reported with rationales in the article. The study achieved its pre‐stated sample size. As this study was conducted in 11 countries across 45 sites, standard of care may have differed (supported by concomitant medication use presented in Table S2). |