Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 26;2004(1):CD003133. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003133.pub2

Lofdahl 1999.

Methods DESIGN 
 ‐parallel‐group 
 ‐multicentre trial
ALLOCATION 
 ‐Random 
 ‐computer‐generated allocation 
 ‐opaque consecutive‐numbered envelopes containing assignment
BLINDING 
 ‐triple‐blind 
 ‐placebo‐controlled 
 ‐identical placebo
WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUTS ‐ described
JADAD's Quality Score = 5
Confirmation of methodology obtained
Participants WELL‐CONTROLLED PARTICIPANTS
RANDOMISED 
 N = 226 
 Montelukast = 113 
 Placebo = 113
WITHDRAWALS 
 Montelukast: 16% 
 Control: 27%
AGE: 16 to 70 years old 
 Montelukast: 40 years (mean) Control: 41 years
GENDER:(% male) Montelukast: 42% 
 Control: 45%
SEVERITY: not described
BASELINE FEV1 (% predicted): 
 Montelukast: 84.4 ± 11.1 % (SD) 
 Control: 82.3 ± 12.9 %
ALLERGEN TRIGGERS: not reported
ASTHMA DURATION: Montelukast: 18 ± 13.3 (SD) years 
 Control: 19 ± 14 years
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 
 ‐non‐smoking adults 
 ‐clinical history of asthma for at least one year 
 ‐treatment with stable, ICS bid for at least 3 weeks prior to pre‐study visit 
 ‐>= 70% FEV1 % Pred 
 ‐>= 15% reversibility after inhaled B2‐agonist
‐after two ICS dose reductions: 
 ‐FEV1 >= 90% of baseline value, 
 ‐levels < baseline level in asthma symptoms and B2‐agonist use, 
 ‐>= 65% of maximum peak flow, and 
 ‐a required prespecified minimum ICS dose was met
EXCLUSION: 
 ‐emergency treatment in past 1 month 
 ‐hospitalised in past 3 months 
 ‐upper respiratory tract infection within 3 weeks
Interventions PROTOCOL: 
 AL + ICS vs same dose 
 ICS (TAPERING ICS dose)
DURATION 
 ‐Dose optimisation period: <=7 weeks (ICS dose reduced to minimum dose necessary to maintain stability before randomisation) 
 ‐Intervention Period: 12 weeks
TEST GROUP 
 ‐Montelukast 10 mg die p.o. + ICS 300 to 3000 ug/day
CONTROL GROUP 
 ‐Placebo + ICS 300 to 3000 ug/day 
 (Various ICS including fluticasone 7%, beclomethasone 16%, 
 BUDesonide 22%, 
 flunisolide 15%, triamcinolone 40%)
DEVICE 
 ‐variety used
‐CO‐TREATMENT: none reported
CRITERIA FOR TAPERING every 2 weeks by 25% of their ICS dose
‐FEV1 >= 90% of value at randomisation 
 ‐B2‐agonist use <= 135% of pre‐allocation 
 ‐Daytime symptoms score <= 120% of pre‐allocation baseline
MINIMAL DOSE OF ICS ALLOWED: None
Outcomes INTENTION‐TO‐TREAT ANALYSES 
 ‐outcomes used at last tolerated dose or 12 weeks
PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS 
 ‐Change from baseline FEV1 at visit of lowest tolerated ICS dose
SYMPTOM SCORES 
 ‐Change from baseline daily symptom scores at visit of lowest tolerated ICS dose
FUNCTIONAL STATUS 
 ‐Change from baseline mean daily use of B2‐agonists at visit of lowest tolerated ICS dose
ICS DOSE REDUCTION: 
 ‐**Mean % change from baseline ICS dose reduction ‐**Change from baseline ICS dose (mcg)
INFLAMMATORY MARKERS: 
 not reported
ADVERSE EFFECTS 
 ‐elevated liver enzymes, headache, nausea, death
WITHDRAWALS 
 ‐reported
(** denotes primary outcomes)
Notes ‐Full Text 1999 and unpublished data
‐Funded by Merck Frosst
‐Confirmation of methodology received June 1999
‐Confirmation of data extraction graciously received from T.F Reiss and G.P. Noonan, June 2000.
‐User‐defined order: 98 
 (mean intervention ICS dose of 976 mcg/ day X 0.1)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Study investigators unaware as to order of treatment group assignment (Cochrane Grade A)