Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;2021(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2

Comparison 1. Sealing versus conventional restoration (CR) (cavitated, permanent dentition).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1.1 Failure: sealing vs CR 1 41 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 5.00 [0.51, 49.27]