Comparison 6. Conventional restoration (CR) versus non‐restorative cavity control (NRCC) (cavitated, primary).
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
6.1 Failure: CR vs NRCC | 1 | 102 | Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 1.16 [0.50, 2.71] |