Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;2021(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2

Comparison 6. Conventional restoration (CR) versus non‐restorative cavity control (NRCC) (cavitated, primary).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
6.1 Failure: CR vs NRCC 1 102 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.50, 2.71]