Strang 2021.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | Primary review outcomes
Secondary review outcomes
Additional outcomes reported
|
|
Notes | Participant data for the 2 cohorts were extracted from the same database, resulting in overlap between cohorts. We do not know how many participants are reported on twice. Sponsor/funding: supported by Region Stockholm (ALF) and the Stockholm Sjukhem Foundation’s Jubilee Fund. COI: no competing financial interests exist. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Selection bias (unrepresentative study group) All outcomes | Low risk | Clear inclusion criteria |
Attrition bias (incomplete outcome assessment/follow up) All outcomes | Low risk | Only assessed when participant was dead |
Detection bias (outcome detectors blinded to intervention) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
Confounding (important prognostic factors or follow‐up not taken adequately into account) All outcomes | High risk | Not controlled for confounders |
Reporting bias (poorly defined study group) All outcomes | Low risk | Study group well defined. |
Reporting bias (poorly defined follow up) All outcomes | Low risk | Assessed until death |
Reporting bias (poorly defined outcome) All outcomes | Low risk | Validated questionnaire (ELQ) used. |
CSCI: continuous subcutaneous infusion
m‐RASS: modified Richmond Agitation‐Sedation Scale
COI: Conflict of Interest
IQR: Interquatile Range
NR: Not reported