TABLE 5.
Post hoc RM-ANCOVAs and Bonferroni adjusted pairwise comparisons between the persuasion strategies among immigrant Arabs.
| Immigrant Arabs in non-Arabic Muslim countries |
Immigrant Arabs in East Asian countries |
Immigrant Arabs in Western countries |
||||
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |
| Reciprocity | 6.19a | 0.94 | 6.53a | 0.623 | 6.28a | 1.03 |
| Commitment | 5.53b | 0.97 | 5.88b | 0.86 | 5.57b | 1.03 |
| Consensus | 4.23c | 1.15 | 4.33c | 1.24 | 4.14c | 1.24 |
| Scarcity | 4.00c | 1.30 | 4.23c | 1.16 | 3.99c | 1.42 |
| Authority | 3.18d | 1.18 | 3.18d | 1.16 | 3.01d | 1.26 |
| F*(4,1228) = 7.39 | p < 0.001 | F*(4,1098) = 11.47 | p < 0.001 | F*(4,274) = 6.35 | p < 0.001 | |
*F-values refer to RM-ANCOVA analyses in each culture of residence; values with different superscript letters in each column differed to statistically significant degree, p < 0.001.