Study | Comparison | Time‐to‐complete wound healing | Proportion of wounds completely healed | Comments |
Charles 1991 | Group 1. Compression (short‐stretch bandage) Group 2. No compression |
‐ | Leg ulcers completely healed Group 1. 71% Group 2. 25% |
Unit of analysis is probably ulcers. The authors concluded "the leg ulcers treated with the short‐stretch compression bandage had a statistically significant (chi‐square test) higher healing rate than those treated in the control group." |
Daróczy 2006 | Group 1. Compression (topical povidone‐iodine plus compression) Group 2. No compression (topical povidone‐iodine without compression) |
‐ | Group 1. 82% of 21 patients Group 2. 62% of 21 patients |
|
Kikta 1988 | Group 1. Compression (Unna’s boot) Group 2. No compression (hydroactive dressing) |
Estimated results using Tierney 2007 methods: HR 2.38 95% CI 1.23 to 4.60 (lnHR 0.87 and selnHR 0.34) |
Data included in Analysis 1.2 Group 1. 33/42 ulcers healed Group 2. 21/45 ulcers healed Data included in the associated sensitivity analysis of assuming missing data had unhealed leg ulcers Group 1. 21/42 ulcers healed Group 2. 15/45 ulcers healed. |
Regarding the proportion of wounds completely healed, the difference in the data is due to the different assumptions applied for data analysis (see Sensitivity analysis). |
Morrell 1998 | Group 1. Compression (4‐layer bandaging) Group 2. No compression (usual care) |
Group 1 compared with Group 2. Log rank test statistic 4.90 (df =1, P = 0.03); Univariate Cox analysis: HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.03); Multivariate Cox analysis: HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.35). Median healing time: Group 1. 20 weeks Group 2. 43 weeks Mean number of weeks the participants were free from ulcers: Group 1. 20.1 weeks Group 2. 14.2 (difference 5.9; 95% CI 1.2 to 10.5) |
Number (%) patients with complete healing at 12 months Group 1. 78/120 (65%) Group 2. 62/113 (55%) |
|
O'Brien 2003 | Group 1. Compression (4‐layer bandage) Group 2. No compression |
Group 1 compared with Group 2 HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.9) |
Kaplan–Meier estimate of the proportion healed at 3 months Group 1. 54% Group 2. 34% (P < 0·001). |
|
Rubin 1990 | Group 1. Compression (Unna’s boot) Group 2. No compression (polyurethane foam dressing) |
‐ | ITT analysis: Group 1. 18/19 (94.7%) patients with ulcers healed Group 2. 7/17 (41.2%). Complete cases: Group 1. 18/19 (94.7%) Group 2. 7/8 (87.5%) (Chi‐squared = 8.2, P < 0.005). |
|
Taradaj 2007 | Group 1. Compression Group 2. No compression |
‐ | Narratives: No statistical difference in the pre‐ and post‐treatment changes of total surface area, volume, length, width, field, and granulation surface area among groups (P‐values of all between‐group comparisons > 0.05); the percentage of weekly wound surface change rates; and the percentage of weekly ulcer volume change rates. |
|
Taylor 1998 | Group 1. Compression Group 2. |
Results calculated using the methods in Tierney 2007: HR 4.54 (95% CI 1.65 to 12.49); lnHR 1.51 and selnHR 0.52. Median healing time Group 1. 55 days Group 2. 84 days. (Lee‐Desu statistic 8.603, P = 0.0034). |
Data used in Analysis 1.2 Group 1. 14/18 Group 2. 7/18 Data used in the associated sensitivity analysis of assuming missing data had unhealed leg ulcers Group 1. 12/18 Group 2. 3/18 |
Regarding the proportion of wounds completely healed, the difference in the data is due to the different assumptions applied for data analysis (see Sensitivity analysis). |
Wong 2008a | Group 1. Compression (short‐stretch bandage, and 4‐layer bandage) Group 2. No compression |
‐ | Data used in Analysis 1.2 Group 1. 15/20 Group 2. 5/10 Data used in the associated sensitivity analysis of assuming missing data had unhealed leg ulcers Group 1. 13/20 Group 2. 3/10. |
Regarding the proportion of wounds completely healed, the difference in the data is due to the different assumptions applied for data analysis (see Sensitivity analysis). |
Wong 2008b | Group 1. Compression (short‐stretch bandage) Group 2. Compression (4‐layer bandage) Group 3. No compression |
Cox regression adjusted for age, initial ulcer size, and ulcer duration (hazard ratios for healing for Group 1 and Group 2 relative to Group 3) HR 2.72 (95% CI= 1.53‐4.86); 3.14 (95% CI= 1.74‐5.67) Survival time Mean 7.831 weeks (SE 0.489) for SSB, 8.557 (0.430) for 4LB, 10.378 (0.383) for control. |
Data analysed in Analysis 1.2: Group 1. 48/60 Group 2. 50/60 Group 3. 23/60. Data used in the associated sensitivity analysis of assuming missing data had unhealed leg ulcers Group 1. 38/60 Group 2. 36/60 Group 3. 17/60. |
Regarding the proportion of wounds completely healed, the difference in the data is due to the different assumptions applied for data analysis (see Sensitivity analysis). |
Wong 2012 | Group 1. Compression (short‐stretch bandage) Group 2. Compression (4‐layer bandage) Group 3. No compression |
Time‐to‐complete wound healing Group 1. mean 9.8 (SD 0.77) weeks Group 2. 10.4 (0.80) Group 3. 18.3 (0.86) |
Week 12: Group 1. 66.4% (71 ⁄ 107) Group 2. 59.8% (64 ⁄ 107) Group 3. 28.0% (30 ⁄ 107). Week 24: Group 1. 72.0% (77 ⁄ 107) Group 2. 67.3% (72 ⁄ 107) Group 3. 29.0% (31 ⁄ 107) |