Shiomi 1999b.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised clinical trial with parallel‐group design (2 groups) | |
Participants | 34 women, aged 36 to 72 years, mean age 56 years, with primary biliary cirrhosis Inclusion criteria: primary biliary cirrhosis Exclusion criteria: none stated |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: calcitriol 0.5 μg twice a day (n = 17) Control: no intervention (n = 17) For 1 year |
|
Outcomes | Outcomes reported in abstract of publication Primary outcome: bone mineral density Secondary outcomes: none stated |
|
Stated aim of study | To evaluate the efficacy of calcitriol (1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D) in the treatment of bone disease associated with primary biliary cirrhosis | |
Notes | All participants completed the trial. Additional information received through personal communication with authors on 12 February 2014. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of sequence generation not specified. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method used to conceal allocation not described, so that intervention allocations may have been foreseen in advance of, or during, enrolment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding, and outcome is likely to have been influenced by lack of blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding of outcome assessment, and outcome measurement is likely to have been influenced by lack of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Missing data were unlikely to make treatment effects depart from plausible values. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Not all predefined outcomes reported in full. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Trial may or may not have been free of other components that could put it at risk of bias, such as competing interest bias. |